Whenever anyone peers at their first deconstructed dish, ears perk, brows furrow, nostrils swell, and something unusual happens. Deconstructed food seems to elicit one of several reactions in newcomers. Sometimes that person is intrigued; other times, they are baffled. There are a multitude of in-betweens; but, one thing seems universally true: people react to the sight.
Culinary traditionalists mock things like deconstructed lasagna; meanwhile, fans of molecular gastronomy embrace the food of Wylie Dufresne with fervor. I tend to find solace on both ends of the spectrum. Food, like everything else in life, has the ability to morph. At times, eating should be fun and playful; other times, the endeavor should be restrained and precise. Yes, well-executed classic interpretations are a necessity. However, just because you have steak+cheese+bread does not mean you have a cheesesteak.
While I sit here and wax-poetic, we should probably define the term “deconstructed cuisine.” Deconstruction (wiki) finds its roots in literary criticism. Spaniards claim to have taken its culinary application from infancy to full-forced trend.
At heart, any deconstructed dish should contain all the classic components found in the “original.” The difference is in the preparation. When creating a dish utilizing deconstructive techniques, the ingredients are essentially prepared and treated on their own. It is during the plating and presentation stages that everything is brought together.
However, deconstructed food is elaborate and somewhat “artsy-fartsy.” So someone making deconstructed lasagna may elect to present the dish as a casserole. In that instance, the elements are initially cooked individually. Then, they are combined and finished off in the oven.
You can see how loose the application can be. Even for me, things like a deconstructed Bloody Mary (pictured below) can be a bit much. At a certain point, it stops being a Bloody Mary and becomes its own concoction. 
Nonetheless, anyone who dabbles in deconstructed cuisine has to appreciate the artistic elements of the process. Anyone can make a grilled cheese from two slices of bread and some queso. Playing with the form is great for the creative juices. However, pomp and circumstance have to be as carefully balanced as the components of said dish.
At the end of the day, remember that food should first and foremost taste good. A quote from Anthony Bourdain seems to capture all that is good and bad in deconstructed cooking:
Intermittent flavors of the constituent elements mingle with the remembered taste of unified chowder.
So I kept seeing FoodieBuddha.com on my Flickr stats page and wasn’t sure why. Finally today I checked into it and came across my photo here on your post. Man oh man that seems like so long ago. Culinary school dishes, whatcha gonna do? I had a great obsession with deconstructed food for quite some time until I realized I didn’t know how to actually make a normal dish that tasted decent. Nice post and glad you’ve brought me some viewers…even if it was at my expense 😉
Glad you’re cool with the use of the image. It’s one of the better shots I found out there!!! I hope the viewers thumb through all your stuff … nice job with your photography.
This morning some folks in my office were talking about deconstructed food and trying to wrap their heads around it. I remembered this post and sent it on — thanks!